In this article, I will compare the same staking plans over the same series of bets. The original article looked at all-in, fixed wager, Martingale, Fibonacci and proportional staking methodologies by seeing how they performed over an imaginary series of 500 binary bets (odds of 2.00) where the bettor starts with a bankroll of $1,000, risks $100 for the initial wager (except for ‘all-in’ where it’s $1,000) which then varies thereafter according to the staking method, and holds 10% expected value – that is to say he wins 55% of the time. Nevertheless, some methods of staking are inherently riskier than others, and it pays to be able to tell them apart. Of course, without positive expected value, no money management system in the world can turn a losing system into a winning one. In October 2016, Pinnacle published the article Staking: One method to improve your betting, in an attempt to demonstrate that the amount you bet is actually more important than what you bet on.